Events-Archive

“Games and play are at once material and imaginary. They are real – but they trouble commonsense notions of reality; they offer multiple realities of fantasy, performance and intense experience” (Giddings 2014, S. 3).

In der Fortsetzung des Gesprächs- und Filmformats „Kameraethnographie trifft Seth Giddings“ explorieren wir unterschiedliche Spielräume in digitalen Kindheiten anhand aktueller Filme aus unserem Projekt, die wir entlang von Seth Giddings‘ „Gameworlds” (2014) diskutieren. Wir fragen, auf welche Weisen Vorstellungskraft zwischen Körpern, Dingen, Medien und Spielsystemen hervorgebracht wird und wie im Spiel Medientechnologien, Sounds, Spielzeuge und Rhythmen etc. alternative Raum-Zeitlichkeiten erzeugen.

Wir diskutieren den mikroethologischen Ansatz von Giddings mit seinem Schwerpunkt auf (digitaler) Materialität entlang gelebter Spielerfahrungen von Kindern. Wir vergleichen diesen mit dem mikroethnographischen Ansatz und der Kamera-Ethnographie als methodologische Grundlagen im Projekt mit der Frage: Wie wird Imagination von Kindern im Spiel beobachtbar?

Literatur:

Giddings, Seth (2014): Gameworlds. Virtual Media and Children’s Everyday Play. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic

Wer teilnehmen möchte, sendet bitte eine Mail an hoa.mai.tran@uni-siegen.de, um den Webex-Link und den Text im Vorfeld zu erhalten.

The SFB cordially invites you to the oral examination for Niklas Strüver’s doctoral dissertation.

Monday, July 27, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. in Room AH-A 217/18.

During the defense, the findings of his dissertation will be presented to the examination committee and academically defended. The title of his dissertation is “Speaking on behalf of the periphery: Third-party relationships in Amazon’s Alexa ecosystem” and it examines the developmental dynamics of the voice assistant Alexa from the perspectives of infrastructure and platform theory. Drawing on the four articles presented, the dissertation explores how Alexa functions as an infrastructure and platform for third-party providers in business and academia, and what sociotechnical power imbalances arise in the process. This analysis allows for an examination of the social relationships that Amazon, as the manufacturer, enters into with complementary providers on the periphery of the platform. Through various empirical approaches, it is possible, despite the usual secrecy maintained by large corporations, to gain insight into the development of technologies that are present in the everyday lives of many people.

It will be conducted in German and supervised by the two examiners, Dagmar Hoffmann and Armin Beverungen.

Schedule

14:15 – 15:00 Dr. Clemens Eisenmann: “Sociology of Perception”

15:00 – 15:45 Dr. Philippe Sormani: “Relocating ‘AI’: a Praxeological Approach”

More information coming soon.

The GDPR promises us that we can receive our personal data from anyone who collected it upon request. Research has already shown this does not really work as envisioned in law.

This lecture asks to dig deeper into the topic, by approaching data subject rights, in particular Article 15 GDPR, as a methodological device for studying digital infrastructures under conditions of limited access. Access rights are first a legal protection and empowerment measure, but we examine how they can be used to trace tracking practices, data flows and processes of identity formation in online advertising ecosystems. In the course of this research we bridge media studies and digital methods with legal studies. The data collection process is first an encounter with the infrastructures that exist to inform users, but also an encounter of the user with fragments of themselves.

From a legal perspective, we analyse how data protection law conceptualises different forms of identity and how identities are legally attributed to a data subject. At the same time, we interrogate the limits of this framework: while the GDPR presupposes that personal data can be linked to an identified or identifiable natural person, contemporary data practices routinely challenge these distinctions. Identities emerge from combinations of data points that individually fall below the threshold of “personal data,” yet collectively constitute a recognisable profile. The legal figure of the data subject is thus both a normative construct and an unstable one, continuously deconstructed and reassembled by digital infrastructures.

Yarden Skop & Maria Boole (University of Paderborn & Siegen / Project A07 @ SFB 1187 Media of Cooperation)

Topics can be submitted to the board meetings via the status representatives two weeks before the meeting at the latest. Invitations go out two weeks before the meeting. Funding applications must be submitted at least two weeks in advance via the coordination (Dominik Schrey), including an explanation, cost estimate, detailed cost overview, and programme.

Applications  must be submitted at least two weeks in advance via the coordination (Dominik Schrey), including an explanation and additional documents. For further information, please refer to the following templates. Please note that the templates are only available in German. For english versions please contact Dominik Schrey:

• Application for association
• Application for funding of a publication
• Application for funding of an event

The board meetings include reports, public topics, and various which are open to all SFB members. Personal and financial matters won’t be public and will be discussed after the public part. Webex links for online participation will be sent out on the previous Friday. Attendance on-site is possible. 

Digital protocols will be provided via sciebo. 

Writing Retreat des internen SFB-Graduiertenkollegs inkl. Workshop und Einzelcoachings durch Dr. Anselm Spindler (trainofthought.de).

14:15 – 15:45: “Counter-Choreographies of Data: Activism Between Platform and Ground”

This lecture examines how methodological choices distribute attention, agency, and legibility within knowledge production, focusing on digital platforms as contested sites where data is shaped by algorithmic infrastructures, political pressure, and regimes of visibility. Social media posts are approached not as neutral evidence, but as partial and mediated traces of activism.

Drawing on personal research practice, the lecture traces digital content back to its on-site realities—embodied experiences, spatial conditions, and forms of risk that remain off-screen. Through performative reactivation, these traces are re-situated to produce counter-narratives that disrupt the manipulated datasets of authoritarian regimes, transforming research into a site for witnessing, resistance, and collective memory.

The concept of “counter-choreographies of data” frames this methodology as a political intervention that foregrounds the uncounted, blinded, and misrepresented. Positioning research as activism, the lecture argues for cooperative methodologies that make conflicts over categories, metrics, and evidence explicit, accountable, and revisable.

Azadeh Ganjeh (Hochschule für Künste im Sozialen Ottersberg / Mercator Fellow @ SFB 1187 Media of Cooperation)

Azadeh Ganjeh is a Performance Artist and scholar specializing in the intersection of socio-political contexts and the realm of Performance Art and performative culture. Her research, rooted in the observance and analysis of public interventions, protests, performance events and Theatres, reveals the intricate link between performance art and socio-political movements. Since 2004, with her collective, Rebel-IST-hah!, her artistic practice has focused on aesthetic strategies and dramaturgical interventions to create an inclusive space of appearance and activism through the Performing Arts. As an activist and performance artist, her research project focuses on the aesthetics of the performative presence of the body in the public space as resistance. She traces these performances through a focus on non-Eurocentric historiography of civil resistance in the Global South and climate activism in sacrifice zones, which occurs through Performing Arts. Due to the state’s opposition to her secular approach, advocacy for academic freedom, and her active role as a feminist artist and activist, she encountered political restraints and threats from the authorities of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and since 2022, found herself compelled to seek exile in Germany as a Scholar at Risk.

16:00 – 17:30: “Machineries of Similarity and Difference: AIDS From Its Research Infrastructures”

What kinds of practical and epistemic work are required to draw together different kinds of data, people, and evidence? This talk examines ‘interoperability’ by tracing the history of three AIDS cohort studies that, over three decades, were gradually merged into a single research network. Today, with a double-click, researchers can combine data collected from gay and bisexual men in the 1980s with materials gathered from women in the North of the US beginning in the 1990s and in the South of the US in the 2010s—data that remain scientifically comparable. Yet today’s apparent ease reveals next to nothing about the political protests and scientific disputes that made such comparability possible. The interoperability of these AIDS research data rests on decades of negotiation over how blood, data, and human participants could be rendered equivalent.

David Ribes (University of Washington)

David Ribes is professor in the Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering (HCDE) and director of the Science, Technology and Society Studies (STSS) program at the University of Washington, Seattle. He is a sociologist of science and technology who focuses on the development and sustainability of research infrastructures; their relation to long-term changes in the conduct of science; and, transformations in objects of research. David is a regular contributor to the fields of Science and Technology Studies (STS) and Information Studies. His methods are ethnographic, archival-historical and comparative. See davidribes.com or dataecologi.es for more.

14:15 – 15:00 Dr. Tim Hector: Language and Norms at Digital Interfaces. Adaptation, Friction, and Creativity in Situated Interaction with Digital Technologies

15:00 – 15:45 Dr. Astrid Vogelpohl: Hybrid Spaces – Hybrid Selves
Early Childhood and Smartphone

Ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis and the Analysis of Technologized Interaction at Work with Functional Diversity & Mixed Abilities

Prof. Maija Hirvonen (Tampere University)

My talk explores theoretical and methodological positions in the ethnomethodological and conversation-analytical studies (EMCA) of dis/ability in technologized workplace interaction. The talk features research questions and sample analyses from a major European research and innovation project, NewWorkTech, which has collected naturalistic video-recorded data with six different dis/ability groups and from workplaces in six different countries.

EMCA aims at describing systems of situated human conduct and practices of social and technologized interaction from the members’ perspective. Today, this perspective is typically accomplished by an analytical process of interpreting naturally occurring video data in such way that researchers seek to understand the observable conduct and practices as one of the participants. With the emphasis on multimodality and, increasingly, multisensoriality, the analysis of interaction involves a detailed observation of the spatial, visual and other nonverbal modalities as resources of the system.

With regard to dis/ability and functional diversity, such as blindness or neurodivergence, EMCA studies must question the premises of acquiring a ”members’ perspective” in (inter)action which is (yet) not known to or experienced by the researcher. My talk intends to pave some ways for the methodological development in order to analyse (technologized) interaction cooperatively from the perspective of functional diversity and mixed ability – concepts which do not put ontological priority to any one sense or way of being in the world.

Topics can be submitted to the board meetings via the status representatives two weeks before the meeting at the latest. Invitations go out two weeks before the meeting. Funding applications must be submitted at least two weeks in advance via the coordination (Dominik Schrey), including an explanation, cost estimate, detailed cost overview, and programme.

Applications  must be submitted at least two weeks in advance via the coordination (Dominik Schrey), including an explanation and additional documents. For further information, please refer to the following templates. Please note that the tempolates are only available in German. For english versions please contact Dominik Schrey:

• Application for association
• Application for funding of a publication
• Application for funding of an event

The board meetings include reports, public topics, and various which are open to all SFB members. Personal and financial matters won’t be public and will be discussed after the public part. Webex links for online participation will be sent out on the previous Friday. Attendance on-site is possible. 

Digital protocols will be provided via sciebo. 

14:15 – 15:00 Dr. Johannes Schick: “The Zoomorphology of Gestures: Interspecies Learning and Technical Invention in Early Human Evolution”

15:00 – 15:45 Dr. Dominik Schrey: title t.b.a.

More information coming soon.

Dr. Johannes Schick: “The Zoomorphology of Gestures: Interspecies Learning and Technical Invention in Early Human Evolution”

This article develops a transindividual theory of multispecies technics. Drawing on Gilbert Simondon’s ontogenetic theory of individuation, I extend his concept of the associated milieu beyond the relation between humans and technical objects to interspecies relations. I argue that the earliest technical gestures in hominin history may have emerged from the reciprocal relationship between human and non-human animals, and I introduce the notion of zoogestures to characterise this transindividual multispecies process. Three criteria operationalise the multispecies associated milieu: a living being must co-constitute the conditions of an operation involving another living being; the operation must depend on the presence or behaviour of that other living being; and the relation must open up or stabilise new possibilities for action. I test this heuristic against three cases of interspecies technical operations: social learning between domesticated horses (ponying) and within wild chimpanzee populations (Tinka); the invention of a new technical behaviour by a domesticated cow (Veronika) in a human milieu; and the multispecies ecological co-construction of beaver-human cohabitation in prehistory. The conclusion develops Simondon’s notion of présence to argue that technical gestures emerge not as Leroi-Gourhan’s exudations or extensions of the (human) body, but as a multispecies event.

Sensorische Selbstvermessung mit Smartwatches und das Teilen von Gesundheitsdaten in Sozialen Netzwerken, Kontrolle von Umweltdaten im intelligenten Zuhause sowie Telemedizin und digitale Assistenzsysteme zur Förderung von Gesundheit und Prävention gelten als Beispiele für die „Medizin der Zukunft“. Diese hat sowohl Licht- als auch Schattenseiten. Wie gehen die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer vor diesem Hintergrund mit den neuen Technologien und den damit verbundenen sozialen Erwartungen, Hoffnungen und Sorgen praktisch um? Das Projekt „Un/erbetene Beobachtung in Interaktion“ im Sonderforschungsbereich „Medien der Kooperation“ an der Universität Siegen untersucht durch Interviews, begleitete Wohnungsrundgänge und Videoaufzeichnungen das alltägliche Leben mit „smarten“ Technologien zwischen (Selbst-)Überwachung und kreativer Aneignung. In der Podiumsdiskussion debattieren die Projektverantwortlichen über gesundheitsbezogene Aspekte mit Forschenden verschiedener Disziplinen und mit dem Siegener Publikum.

Podiumsteilnehmer: 

Prof. Dr. Stefan Heinemann, Professor für Wirtschaftsethik an der FOM Hochschule Berlin sowie Sprecher der Ethik-Ellipse Smart Hospital der Universitätsmedizin Essen

Prof. Dr. Dagmar Hoffmann, Professorin für Medienwissenschaft – Medien und Kommunikation/Gender Media Studies an der Universität Siegen & SFB 1187, Teilprojekt B06

Dr. Paula Stehr, Akademische Rätin am Institut für Kommunikationswissenschaft und Medienforschung, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU)

Prof. Dr. Torsten Voigt, Professor für Soziologie mit dem Schwerpunkt Technik und Diversität, RWTH Aachen

Moderation: Prof. Dr. Stephan Habscheid, Professor für Germanistik/Angewandte Sprachwissenschaft an der Universität Siegen & SFB 1187, Teilprojekt B06.

Thematischer Impuls zum Einstieg: Niklas Strüver, M.A., SFB 1187, Teilprojekt B06.