INF - Infrastructures for Collaborative Sensory RDM Practices
Former Researchers:
Prof. Dr. Kai Daniel
(Former Principal Investigator)
Friederike Breuer, M.A.
(Associate Member)
Dr. Helena Karasti
(Associate Member)
Annette Strauch, M.A.
(Associate Member)
Dr. Matthias Korn
(Associate Member)
Dr. Michael Dahnke
(Associate Member)
„The project is concerned with the design, implementation and evaluation of workflows and tools for collaborative research data management, with a focus on sensing and sense-making.“
News
Challenges and affordances of doing media research with generative AI
This series explores the challenges and affordances of doing media research with generative AI. AI is not only a subject of media studies, but deployed to collect data, interpret texts, perform mult-modal analysis, and assist writing. But what happens when prompts, models, and training data enter the methodological core of media studies? On what grounds can we cooperate with AI in research? The seminar series Synthetic Methods takes these questions as its point of departure. It explores current practices, tools, approaches and issues of synthetic methods, asking how AI participates in producing, mediating, and interpreting knowledge.
In recent years, the tools and infrastructures of generative AI—large language models, multimodal systems, and computer-vision pipelines—have begun to blur the boundaries between data collection, analysis, and interpretation. AI does not simply assist researchers in automating tasks; it brings in its own epistemic logics, biases, and inscriptions. Text and image generation models suggest categories, segment data, or simulate field interactions. They act as synthetic interlocutors in ethnographic work, as co-coders in qualitative analysis, or as analytical lenses in cultural analytics. The series engages with these developments hands-on and conceptually, examining what it means to “do research with AI.”
At the centre of the series lies an interest in the distributed accomplishment of discovery between humans and AI. Instead of handing analytical capacity entirely to computational systems, we will explore how reasoning, interpretation, and sense-making can emerge collaboratively across human and AI agencies. Generative models may extend perception and imagination, but they also depend on human intervention, interpretation, and evaluative judgment. The sessions thus foreground research as a shared practice of translation and negotiation, where human reflexivity and AI inference together shape what counts as evidence, relevance, and insight. This distributed perspective opens the space to examine the affordances, issues, and evaluative criteria that govern scholarship when AI becomes part of the epistemic process: How can we maintain reflexive, critical and ethical orientations while experimenting with new, mixed agencies of knowing?
Over the course of the semester, the series will address a range of perspectives and practices. An initial session on infrastructures and AI ethics situates large-scale models within the political economies of cloud computing, highlighting questions of privacy, transparency, and data provenance. Subsequent meetings explore how AI reshapes established methodological domains: as an assistant in qualitative analysis and ethnography, as a writing companion and reflective mirror in academic text production, and as a tool for analyzing visual and multimodal materials. Participants will experiment with both commercial and locally hosted models, comparing their capacities and constraints.
Specific attention will be given to the question if and how synthetic methods require specific modes and practices of methodological reflexivity. The series does not treat models as neutral instruments but as infrastructures with their own histories, biases, and aesthetics. Engaging with generative systems thus becomes an exercise in distributed reflexivity: models, prompts, and humans co-produce insight. This distributed agency raises fundamental questions of authorship, responsibility, and transparency that reach beyond technical documentation. To “work synthetically” is to navigate this entanglement without surrendering critical distance—to cultivate a mode of inquiry that remains aware of its own mediations.
05.11. AI for Ethnographic Analysis
19.11. Writing with AI with Sergei Pashakhin
3.12. System Prompts with Marcus Burkhardt & Hendrik Bender
17.12. Voice of Machine Theft with Rosa Menkman und David Gauthier
14.01. Metabolic Images and Method Maps with Elena Pilipets
Location
All lectures take place on-site in Siegen with a hybrid setting. You can register to get the Webex-link and join sessions online.
University Siegen
room: AH-A 217/18
Herrengarten 3
57072 Siegen
Registration
Please register via email to info[æt]sfb1187.uni-siegen.de
Organisation
The series is organized by INF project “Infrastructures for Collaborative Sensory RDM Practices” in collaboration with Carolin Gerlitz, Elena Pilipets, Dominik Schrey, Sara Messelaar Hammerschmidt, Sergei Pashakhin & Hina Firdaus.

Der SFB und die Universität Siegen nimmt Abschied von Prof. Dr. Volkmar Pipek.
Am 6. Januar 2024 verstarb nach langer, schwerer Krankheit im Alter von 56 Jahren Prof. Dr. Volkmar Pipek. Prof. Pipek war von 2006 bis 2013 zunächst als Juniorprofessor im Fach Wirtschaftsinformatik der Fakultät III an der Universität Siegen tätig bevor er zum 1. Februar 2013 zum Universitätsprofessor für „Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Media” berufen wurde. Mit ihm verliert der SFB und die Universität einen international renommierten Forscher und guten Freund.
Einen ausführlichen Nachruf und eine Gedenkseite für Prof. Pipek finden Sie hier
Unser tief empfundenes Mitgefühl gilt seiner Familie und Freund*innen.
Executive Summary
The results of the sub-project INF from the second funding phase focused on infrastructural research data management (RDM) solutions for praxeological research practice, which are the focus of SFB 1187. This includes providing discipline-independent basic infrastructures, processes and services for long-term archiving and teaching data protection skills. Based on this, in cooperation with the researchers, (a) a solution tailored to praxeological research methods for documenting research data practices ("research hub"), (b) research data infrastructure by using interfaces to various verification and work environments (e.g. ORCID, RDMO, Sciebo, DSpace) and (c) comprehensive interface for processing the metadata and Data Story concept were developed.
In the upcoming third phase, the INF project will continue to focus on providing necessary basic infrastructures on the one hand and developing specialized research data infrastructures on the other hand, taking into account sensor data and sensory practices. Focus is on the following areas:
- Further developing and testing the implemented collaborative RDM workflows, modules and concepts with a focus on sensory and meaningful data practices.
- (Further) developing technological tools for acquiring (sensing) and evaluating (sense-making) sensor data in the research process, including digital and sensory methods
- Capturing the critical reflexivity of current research data practices and examining the collaborative appropriation of the IT tools provided for this.
- Assisting in exploring machine learning methods for sensory data practices.
Basic data infrastructures are further developed and maintained by the applicants in close coordination with the IT infrastructures that already exist at the ZIMT. During development, special attention is paid to the legal and ethical guidelines, fundamentals of information security, data protection and FAIR data principles, because these areas play a particularly important role with regard to sensory data practices. In addition, together with the sub-projects, it should be explored what role the use of machine learning methods can play in collecting and especially analyzing the research data collected. At the same time, the metadata interface is continuously updated and expanded in order to offer the created metadata description as comprehensive a set of all data formats used as possible. Furthermore, interfaces are developed and evaluated that integrate external software systems via secure interfaces. This is achieved through a participatory, practice-based approach together with the communities of practice established in the CRC 1187. The INF project documents and reflects the research-based appropriation practices as well as cooperatively constituting research infrastructures and their methods.
INF focuses on the further development of research data infrastructures with a focus on sensory media:
- Development and evaluation of collaborative Research Data Management (RDM) workflows
- Implementation of new modules for cross-platform data work
- Discussion and critical reflection of AI-based methods and tools
- Provision and integration of data stories for curating and sharing (media) ethnographic data

(Treloar et al. 2008, 6)

INF project functions as translator and mediator for institutional requirements, legal/technical standards, and researcher needs as well as practices.
It uses participatory and user-centered design methods.
Interdisciplinary discussions on sensor data collaboration and machine learning effects on RDM practices
- Empirical practice analysis alongside design and conceptualization of research data infrastructures
- Attention on sensor systems and requirements analysis
WP1 aims to test and further develop collaborative sensory RDM workflows, providing technological and organizational support and removing barriers that may prevent meeting the FAIRness criteria.
WP2 involves extending and adapting modules to include other file-sharing systems and metadata interface processing.
WP3 focuses on supporting the reflexivity of AI-based data practices through demonstration and tech lab.
The aim is to ensure that the process does not depend on custom scripts that are not supported in the long term
compared to APIs.

➔ Find the Project Archive 2020–2023 here
Publications
Current
Socio-Informatics: A Practice-based Perspective on the Design and Use of IT Artifacts
The last 25 years have seen a small revolution in our approach to the understanding of new technology and information systems. It has become a founding assumption of computer-supported cooperative work and human–computer interaction that in the future, if not already, most computer applications will be socially embedded in the sense that they will become infrastructures (in some sense) for the development of the social practices which they are designed to support. Assuming that IT artifacts have to be understood in this sociotechnical way, traditional criteria for good design in computer science, such as performance, reliability, stability or usability, arguably need to be supplemented by methods and perspectives which illuminate the way in which technology and social practice are mutually elaborating. This book concerns the philosophy, conceptual apparatus, and methodological concerns which will inform the development of a systematic and long-term human-centered approach to the IT-product life cycle, addressing issues concerned with appropriation and infrastructuring. This entails an orientation to “practice-based computing.” The book contains a number of chapters which examine both the conceptual foundations of such an approach, and a number of empirical case studies that exemplify it.
Wulf, Volker, Volkmar Pipek, David Randall, Markus Rhode, Kjeld Schmidt und Gunnar Stevens, Hrsg. 2018. Socio-Informatics: A Practice-based Perspective on the Design and Use of IT Artifacts. First edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198733249.001.0001.
