„The project is dedicated to the media-theoretical question of how media and spaces are produced cooperatively through navigational practices. To this end, it examines the interplay of motile and mobile components of sensor-loaded urban micronavigation.“
Special Issue “Frictions: Conflicts, Controversies and Design Alternatives in Digital Valuation” of Digital Culture & Society
Edited by Marcus Burkhardt (Paderborn University), Tatjana Seitz (University of Siegen), Jonathan Kropf (University Kassel) and Carsten Ochs (University Kassel).
The latest special issue of Digital Culture & Society takes a look at frictions of digital infrastructures.
Digital infrastructures often appear to run smoothly – but it is precisely in their frictions that value conflicts, power asymmetries and scope for design become apparent. The latest special issue “Frictions: Conflicts, Controversies and Design Alternatives in Digital Valuation” takes a look at these areas of tension. The issue brings together interdisciplinary perspectives from media studies, STS and sociology – and offers valuable insights into the contradictory dynamics of the digital present. Contributors include CRC members Tatjana Seitz and Marcus Burkhardt as well as our CRC speaker Carolin Gerlitz.
Editoral text:
“With the proliferation of smart devices such as smartphones, smart watches, and smart speakers as well as the ongoing push toward smart cities, humans, technologies, and environments have become entangled in increasingly complex yet seemingly frictionless infrastructures of datafication and computation.
A seemingly frictionless user experience, however, conceals the contradictions, power asymmetries, and polarisations that shape our digital cultures. This issue of Digital Culture & Society takes the notion of frictions as a starting point for a situated analysis of our digital present. Frictions are sites where criticism is sparked, value conflicts are negotiated, and design alternatives are explored. By bringing together research from media studies, science and technology studies (STS), and sociology, this issue begins to synthesise and systematise the structural inconsistencies that frictions expose.”
About the Editors
Marcus Burkhardt is a Professor for Media, Algorithms, and Society at the Institute for Media Studies at Paderborn University. He is principal investigator of the projects B08 – “Agentic Media: Formations of Semi-Autonomy” and A07 – “The Industry of Personal Data” in the DFG-funded CRC 1187 “Media of Cooperation” at the University of Siegen. His research focuses on the intersection of media cultural studies on digital, algorithmic media and the development and application of digital methods.
Dr. Jonathan Kropf is research Associate at the University of Kassel (Sociological Theory ) and leads the project “Music Analytics – The Evaluation of Data in the Music Industry” (funded by the Fritz Thyssen Foundation).
Digital Culture & Society is a refereed, international journal, fostering discussion about the ways in which digital technologies, platforms and applications reconfigure daily lives and practices. It offers a forum for critical analysis and inquiries into digital media theory. The journal provides a publication environment for interdisciplinary research approaches, contemporary theory developments and methodological innovation in digital media studies. It invites reflection on how culture unfolds through the use of digital technology, and how it conversely influences the development of digital technology itself.
Carolin Gerlitz is a full member of the Academy of Sciences and Literature in Mainz
At its last meeting, the Academy of Sciences and Literature in Mainz elected media science Professor Carolin Gerlitz from the University of Siegen as a full member.
Carolin Gerlitz holds the chair of „Digital Media and Methods“ the University of Siegen and is also the spokesperson for our Collaborative Research Center 1187 “Media of Cooperation”. She is principal investigator of the project A03 – Navigation in Online/Offline Spaces. Gerlitz is co-founder of the “Center for Digital Methodologies in Media, Language and Research” and a long-standing member of the Digital Methods Initiative and the Public Data Labs.
Gerlitz studied social and science communication in Berlin (Berlin University of the Arts) and gender, media and culture at Goldsmiths College, University of London, where she completed her Doctorate in Sociology. She then worked in London and Amsterdam before taking up a professorship at the University of Siegen in 2016. Gerlitz focuses on digital media technologies and methods as well as software and platform studies.
About the Academy of Sciences and Literature
The Academy of Sciences and Literature is a trans-regional association of personalities from the fields of science, literature and music. It serves to cultivate the sciences, literature and music and in this way contributes to the preservation and promotion of cultural heritage. The academy is a place of dialog that focuses on interdisciplinary exchange. The Academy in Mainz currently supervises 37 research projects from all disciplines with a focus on long-term basic research.
The members of the Academy are divided into three classes (Mathematics and Natural Sciences Class, Literature and Music Class, Humanities and Social Sciences Class). Carolin Gerlitz is a member of the humanities and social sciences class.
Convergence 30 (1) Special Issue on „Critical Technical Practice(s) in Digital Research“
Daniela van Geenen (University of Siegen)
Karin van Es (University Utrecht)
Jonathan Gray (King’s College London)
Our CRC-Member Daniela van Geenen (A03), together with Karin van Es and Jonathan Gray, edited the special issue “Critical Technical Practice(s) in Digital Research”, which has now been published in Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 30 (1).
Save the date: the editors will (soft) launch the issue at the CRC research forum on 10 July, 2 to 4 pm CEST with some short presentations. You can join the event either online or in Siegen! Contact Daniela van Geenen.
Links to the articles and the living literature collection (Zotero group) can be found here.
In this special issue, the authors turn to ideas of and approaches to critical technical practices (CTPs) as entry points to doing critique and doing things critically in digitally mediated cultures and societies. They explore the pluralisation of ‘critical technical practice’, starting from its early formulations in the context of AI research and development (Agre, 1997a, 1997b) to the many ways in which it has resonated and been taken up by different publications, projects, groups, and communities of practice, and what it has come to mean. Agre defined CTP as a situational, practical, and constructive way of working: ‘a technical practice for which critical reflection upon the practice is part of the practice itself’ (1997a: XII). Communities of practice in which the notion has been adopted, adapted, and put to use range from human–computer interaction (HCI) to media art and pedagogy, from science and technology studies (STS) and computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) to digital humanities, media studies and data studies. This special issue serves as an invitation to (re)consider what it means to use this notion drawing on a wider body of work, including beyond Agre. In this introduction, they review and discuss CTPs according to (1) Agre, (2) indexed research, and (3) contributors to this special issue. They conclude with some questions and considerations for those interested in working with this notion.
The issue is at the same time timely and timeless, featuring contributions by Tatjana Seitz (A01) & Sam Hind; Michael Dieter; Jean-Marie John-Mathews, Robin De Mourat, Donato Ricci and Maxime Crépel; Anders Koed Madsen; Winnie Soon and Pablo Velasco; Mathieu Jacomy and Anders Munk; Jessica Ogden, Edward Summers and Shawn Walker; Urszula Pawlicka-Deger; Simon Hirsbrunner, Michael Tebbe and Claudia Müller-Birn; Bernhard Rieder, Eric Borra and Stijn Peters; Carolin Gerlitz (A03 & Speaker of the CRC 1187), Fernando van der Vlist and Jason Chao; Daniel Chavez Heras; and Sabine Niederer and Natalia Sanchez Querubin.
About the Editors
Daniela van Geenen is a lecturer in Data Journalism and Visualization at the University of Applied Sciences Utrecht and is also a Ph.D. candidate at the DFG CRC 1187 “Media of Cooperation” and member of the project “A03 – Navigation in Online/Offline Spaces” at the University of Siegen
Karin van Esis associate professor Media & Culture Studies and project lead Humanities at Data School at Utrecht University.
Jonathan Gray is Reader in Critical Infrastructure Studies at the Department of Digital Humanities, King’s College London.
About the Journal
Convergence is an international peer-reviewed academic journal which was set up in 1995 to address the creative, social, political and pedagogical issues raised by the advent of new media technologies. As an international research journal, it provides a forum both for monitoring and exploring developments in the field and for encouraging, publishing and promoting vital innovative research. Adopting an inter-disciplinary approach and published six times a year, Convergence has developed this area into an entirely new research field.
Executive summary
The sub-project is dedicated to the media-theoretical question of how media and spaces are brought about cooperatively through navigational practices. After A03 dealt with transforming navigation applications to social media and platforms in the first phase, the second funding phase focused on semi-autonomous navigation processes. In the third funding phase, the sub-project examines decision-intensive, media-supported navigation situations in urban areas characterized by an infrastructure loaded with sensor technology. In the literature on the "“Internet of Things”, this mode of mobility is also described as context-related micronavigation. Micronavigation is defined as a form of movement characterized by common data, media and spatial practices, in which transport media and modes are used relatively briefly or changed frequently. The aim of the sub-project is to analyze and theoretically describe the cooperative production of data, media and space practices in micronavigation across online and offline worlds. Focus of the project is empirically researching two forms of navigation: micronavigation with the help of augmented reality devices and micronavigation with e-bikes/scooters in urban areas. Using inventive methods, the project examines how both case studies attempt to create transitions that are as seamless as possible between online- and offline spaces, between means of transport, apps, but also the human and technical sensorium. A03 asks how sensor-intensive navigation media measure and calculate bodies, movements and surroundings and thereby platform urban space, e.g. by integrating their data into political mobility discourses and – ostensibly sustainable – urban infrastructure planning. Based on the analysis of micromotility with local media and micromobility in the urban vicinity, the sub-project is able to develop a common spatial and media theory of micronavigation. Through its empirical case studies, it also specifies a sensor-media understanding of (platform-) media as “environing media.”
A03 investigates micro-navigation in urban spaces.
We define micro-navigation as a form of mobility in which various media and modes of transport are used over short distances, situationally and in close proximity to the body. Micro-navigation is characterised by an intensive entanglement of media, data and spatial practices. A03 studies these practices in urban spaces, focussing on how micro-navigation unfolds with augmented reality apps and glasses, as well as with e-bikes and e-scooters. In doing so, the project aims at:
Defininging the relationship between media-supported motility and mobility practices in the context of urban navigation
Developing a media theory of micronavigation that focuses on seamlessness as a situated accomplishment and socio-technical imaginary
Expand the platform concept for "Environing Media".
To account for the specificity of its research objects, A03 combines methods into Inventive Mixed Methods, building on and expanding proven material-semiotic approaches as well as on praxeological and (sensor-) ethnographic methods for researching multimodal micro-navigation processes. The project will enhance "Sensory Digital Methods" to enquire into the background cooperation characterising the sensor media and platforms used in urban navigation.
WP1 "Micromotility with Proximate Media" examines the motile component of urban micro-navigation along the example of smart glasses, AR apps and wearables [1] from a historical perspective, [2] praxeologically, and [3] with regard to the imaginaries of seamlessness, maplessness and framelessness.
WP2 "Micromobility in Proximate Spaces" studies urban micro-mobility by means of e-bikes/scooters with a focus on [1] software & infrastructures, [2] practices, and [3] platformisation.
WP3 "Sensory navigation in online/offline spaces" reflects on methodological approaches and consolidates the results of the case studies. WP3 will make three theoretical key contributions:
Refine the qualitative understanding of data
Develop a praxeology of distributed immersion
Synthesise a sensory platform theory of micro-navigation
„Digital methods for sensory media research: Toolmaking as a critical technical practice“
‘Digital methods’ turn to medium-specific and online avenues for social and cultural research. While these approaches foster empirical media studies, it has become increasingly challenging to ‘follow the medium’ and ‘repurpose’ its methods. The prominence of sensory media such as ‘smart’ networked devices (e.g. mobile phones) in mundane practices and their infrastructural dependencies confront media scholars with highly contingent objects of study.
Yet, studying such sensor-based devices is crucial, for they enable continuous and unnoticed monitoring of everyday (inter)activity. The article suggests that developing digital methods for sensory media can be understood as specific ‘critical technical practice’ (CTP) by engaging with two toolmaking stories. It draws on and emphasises the fundamental similarity between CTP and digital methods which both aim at conjoining technical engagement and understanding with methodological reflection. The toolmaking stories explicate the making of and the limitations to developing digital methods for increasingly obfuscated mobile sensory media, exploring the possibilities of repurposing their functionality and data. They include building tools for app code analysis focused on apps’ capacity to track sensor data, as well as for ‘sensing’ and analysing network traffic of mobile devices in use. The featured toolmaking then unravels distinctive research affordances, that is, action possibilities for ‘static’ and ‘dynamic’ modes of analysis grappling with the technicity of mobile sensory media and their data. We argue that toolmaking as CTP for sensory media studies implies engaging with these media as entangled infrastructures, examining not just their social, but also their technical ‘multi-situatedness’. This involves investigating the ‘liveliness’ of their data, or how it is generated, processed and made sense of. In conclusion, we discuss implications for ‘doing digital methods’ in sensory media research. Toolmaking itself becomes an inevitable form of media research and critique, inviting and challenging researchers to deploy the media’s situatedness for their investigations.
Chao, Jason; Daniela van Geenen; Carolin Gerlitz und Fernando N. van der Vlist. 2024. “Digital methods for sensory media research: Toolmaking as a critical technical practice”. Convergence. Special Issue: Critical Technical Practice(s) in Digital Research 0 (0): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241226791.
Forthcoming
Kanderske, Max. 2025. “Echtzeit-Geografien”. In Mediengeographie: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis, edited by Tristan Thielmann and Max Kanderske. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Thielmann, Tristan, and Max Kanderske, eds. 2025. Mediengeographie: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
2025
Burkhardt, Marcus, Carsten Ochs, and Tatjana Seitz, eds. 2025. “Frictions: Conflicts, Controversies and Design Alternatives in Digital Valuation”. Digital Culture & Society 9 (2/2023). ISBN: 978-3-8376-6358-7.
2024
Bender, Hendrik, and Max Kanderske. 2024. “Consumer Drone Warfare: Practices, Aesthetics and Discourses of Consumer Drones in the Russo-Ukrainian War”. In Drones in Society: New Visual Aesthetic, edited by Elisa Serafinelli. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56984-5_11.
Borbach, Christoph, and Max Kanderske. 2024. “Counter-practices: Understanding sensor datafication through subversive action”. Dialogues on Digital Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2976864024130597.
Chao, Jason, Daniela van Geenen, Carolin Gerlitz, and Fernando N. van der Vlist. 2024. “Digital methods for sensory media research: Toolmaking as a critical technical practice”. Convergence. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241226791.
Hind, Sam, Fernando van der Vlist, and Max Kanderske. 2024. “Challenges as catalysts: how Waymo’s Open Dataset Challenges shape AI development”. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01927-x.
Van Geenen, Daniela, Karin van Es, and Jonathan WY Gray, eds. 2024. “Special Issue: Critical Technical Practice(s) in Digital Research”. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 30 (1): 5-683. https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cona/30/1.
2023
Gießmann, Sebastian, and Carolin Gerlitz. 2023. “ Einleitung in den Schwerpunkt”. Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft 15 (29): 10–19. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/20051.
Kanderske, Max. 2023. “Domesticating Motile Media: The Routes and Routines of Vacuum Robots”. Edited by David Waldecker, Tim Hector, Niklas Strüver, and Tanja Ertl. Digital Culture and Society 9 (1): 71-98. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2023-0105.
Marres, Nortje, Gabriele Colombo, Liliana Bounegru, Jonathan W. Y. Gray, Carolin Gerlitz, and James Tripp. 2023. “Testing and Not Testing for Coronavirus on Twitter: Surfacing Testing Situations Across Scales With Interpretative Methods”. Social Media + Society 9 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231196538.
2022
Bender, Hendrik, and Max Kanderske. 2022. “Co-Operative Aerial Images: A Geomedia History of the View from Above”. New Media & Society 24 (11): 2468-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221122201.
Borbach, Christoph, and Max Kanderske (Hrsg.). 2022. “Navigieren. Zugänge zu Medien und Praktiken der Raumdurchquerung”. Navigationen. Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturwissenschaften 22 (1). https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/18780.
Borbach, Christoph, and Max Kanderske. 2022. “Navigieren durch heterogene Räume. Wegfindungen jenseits des Nautischen”. Navigationen - Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturwissenschaften 22 (1): 5-31. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/18781.
Burkhardt, Marcus, Daniela van Geenen, Carolin Gerlitz, Sam Hind, Timo Kaerlein, Danny Lämmerhirt, and Axel Volmar, eds. 2022. Interrogating Datafication. Towards a Praxeology of Data. Bielefeld: transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839455616.
Hind, Sam. 2022. “Machinic Sensemaking in the Streets: More-than-Lidar in Autonomous Vehicles”. In Seeing the City Digitally: Processing Urban Space and Time, edited by Gillian Rose, 57-80. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/53965.
Hind, Sam, and Alex Gekker. 2022. “Automotive Parasitism: Examining Mobilieye’s ’Car-Agnostic’ Platformisation”. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221104209.
Hind, Sam, Max Kanderske, and Fernando N. van der Vlist. 2022. “Making the Car ’Platform Ready’: How Big Tech is Driving the Platformisation of Automobility”. Social Media + Society 8 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221098697.
Thielmann, Tristan. 2022. “Die Datalität von Situationen. Zur Aktualität von Torsten Hägerstrand”. Navigationen - Zeitschrift für Medien- & Kulturwissenschaften 22 (1): 239-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.25879/ubsi/10108.
Thielmann, Tristan. 2022. “Environmental conditioning: Mobile geomedia and their lines of becoming in the air, on land, and on water”. New Media & Society.
van der Vlist, Fernando N., Anne Helmond, and Tatjana Seitz. 2022. “API Governance: The Case of Facebook’s Evolution”. Social Media + Society 8 (2): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086228.
2021
Dieter, Michael, Anne Helmond, Nathaniel Tkacz, Fernando N. van der Vlist, and Esther Weltevrede. 2021. “Pandemic platform governance: Mapping the global ecosystem of COVID-19 response apps”. Internet Policy Review 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1568.
Helmond, Anne, and Fernando N. van der Vlist. 2021. “Platform and app histories: Assessing source availability in web archives and app repositories”. In The Past Web: Exploring Web Archives, edited by Daniel Gomez, Elena Demidova, Jane Winters, and Thomas Risse, 203-14. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63291-5_16.
Hind, Sam. 2021. “Introduction: Taking a ’Practice+’ Approach”. Working Paper Series Media of Cooperation 18: 2-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/9948.
Hind, Sam. 2021. “’Nahtlose Autonomie’: Nissans Vision von Interventionen durch Mobilitätsmanager:innen”. In Autonome Autos: Medien- und kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf die Zukunft der Mobilität, edited by Florian Sprenger, 283-314. Digitale Gesellschaft 32. Bielefeld: Transcript. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839450246-010.
Hind, Sam, Magdalena Götz, Danny Lämmerhirt, Hannah Neumann, Anastasia-Patricia Och, Sebastian Randerath, and Tatjana Seitz (Hrsg.). 2021. “In the Spirit of Addition: Taking a ’Practice+’ Approach to Studying Media”. Working Paper Series Media of Cooperation 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/9948.
Hind, Sam, and Tatjana Seitz. 2021. “Agre’s Interactionism”. Working Paper Series Media of Cooperation 18: 22-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/9948.
Kanderske, Max. 2021. “Kranke Karten und elektronische Horizonte. Zur Stellung geografischer Informationssysteme im Kontext des autonomen Fahrens”. In Autonome Autos, edited by Florian Spenger, 315-36. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839450246-011.
van der Vlist, Fernand N., Anne Helmond, Jason Chao, Michael Dieter, Nathaniel Tkacz, and Esther Weltevrede. 2021. “[COVID-19]-related Android (Google Play) and iOS (App Store) app ecosystems”. Open Science Framework (OSF), June 23. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/wq3dr.
van der Vlist, Fernando N., and Anne Helmond. 2021. “Business and data partnerships of the 20 most-used social media platforms”. Open Science Framework (OSF), May 22. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/ekum8.
van der Vlist, Fernando N., and Anne Helmond. 2021. “How partners mediate platform power: Mapping business and data partnerships in the social media ecosystem”. Big Data & Society 8 (1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211025061.
van der Vlist, Fernando N., and Anne Helmond. 2021. “Social media in the audience economy: Business-to-business partnerships and co-dependence”. In AoIR2021 Selected Papers of Internet Research (SPIR): 22nd 2021 Annual Meeting of the Association of Internet Researchers. October 13-16. Chicago, IL: Association of Internet Researchers. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12256.
van der Vlist, Fernando N., Anne Helmond, Marcus Burkhardt, and Tatjana Seitz. 2021. “The technicity of platform governance: Structure and evolution of Facebook’s APIs”. Working Paper Series Media of Cooperation 20. https://doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/9951.
van der Vlist, Fernando N., Anne Helmond, Marcus Burkhardt, and Tatjana Seitz. 2021. “The governance of Facebook Platform”. In AoIR2021 Selected Papers of Internet Research (SPIR): 22nd 2021 Annual Meeting of the Association of Internet Researchers. October 13–16. Chicago, IL: Association of Internet Researchers. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12181.
2020
Abend, Pablo, and Max Kanderske. 2020. “Quantified Gaming. Praktiken und Metriken des verdateten Spiels”. Navigationen - Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturwissenschaften 20 (1): 71-92. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/14336.
Burkhardt, Marcus, Anne Helmond, Tatjana Seitz, and Fernando N. van der Vlist. 2020. “The Evolution of Facebook’s Graph API”. AoIR2020 Selected Papers of Internet Research (SPIR): 21st 2020 Annual Meeting of the Association of Internet Researchers. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11185.
Gekker, Alex, and Sam Hind. 2020. “Re-Valuing Platforms, Reclaiming the Local”. AoIR2020 Selected Papers of Internet Research (SPIR): 21st 2020 Annual Meeting of the Association of Internet Researchers. https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/11119.
Hind, Sam. 2020. “Mobile Mapping”. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, edited by Audrey Kobayashi, 2nd ed., 133-40. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10577-3.
Dieter, M., C. Gerlitz, A. Helmond, N. Tkacz, F. N. van der Vlist, and E. Weltevrede. 2019. “Multi-situated App Studies: Methods and Propositions”. Social Media & Society 5 (2): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119846486.
Gerlitz, C., A. Helmond, F. N. van der Vlist, and E. Weltevrede. 2019. “Regramming the Platform? Infrastructural Relations between Apps and Social Media”. In Computational Culture . Special Issue 7: Apps and Infrastructures. http://computationalculture.net/regramming-the-platform/..
Helmond, A. 2019. “Social Media and Platform Historiography: Challenges and Opportunities”. In TMG – Journal for Media History, 22:6–34. https://doi.org/10.18146/tmg.434.
Helmond, A. 2019. “Facebook’s evolution: Development of a platform-as-infrastructure”. In Internet Histories: Digital Technology, Culture and Society, 3:123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2019.1593667.
Hind, Sam. 2019. “Digital Navigation and the Driving-Machine: Supervision, Calculation, Optimization, and Recognition”. Mobilities 14 (4): 401-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1569581.
Kanderske, Max, and Tristan Thielmann. 2019. “SLAM and the Situativeness of a New Generation of Geomedia Technologies”. Communication and the Public 4 (2): 118-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047319851208.
Thielmann, Tristan. 2019. “Sensormedien: Eine medien- und praxistheoretische Annäherung”. Working Paper Series Media of Cooperation 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/31.
Thielmann, Tristan. 2019. “The Bicycle at the End of the 19th Century: An Instrument for Land Surveying and Mapping”. Proceedings of the 29th International Cartographic Conference 2: 129. https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-proc-2-129-2019.
2018
Alinejad, Donya, Laura I Candidatu, Melis Mevsimler, Claudia Minchilli, Sandra Ponzanesi, and Fernando N van der Vlist. 2018. “Diaspora and mapping methodologies: tracing transnational digital connections with ‘mattering maps’”. Global Networks, a Journal of Transnational Affairs, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12197.
Bender, Hendrik. 2018. “The New Aerial Age: Die wechselseitige Verfertigung gemeinsamer Raum- und Medienpraktiken am Beispiel von Drohnen-Communities”. In Kollaboration: Beiträge zu Medientheorie und Kulturgeschichte der Zusammenarbeit, edited by N. Ghanbari, I. Otto, S. Schramm, and T. Thielmann, 121-45. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846758403_008.
Gerlitz, Carolin. 2018. “Retrieving”. In The International Handbook of Interdisciplinary Research Methods, edited by Celia Lury, 126-31. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714523-19.
Hind Sam, Perkins Chris, Gekker Alex, Evans Daniel, Lammes Sybille, and Wilmott Clancy. 2018. Time for mapping : Cartographic temporalities. PB - Manchester University Press. ISBN: SN - 9781526122520. https://manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526122537/.
Kanderske, Max, and Tristan Thielmann. 2018. “Virtuelle Geographien”. In Handbuch Virtualität, edited by Dawid Kasprowicz and Stefan Rieger. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16358-7_12-2.
Lommel, Michael. 2018. “Was ist Zeit? Synergien im Omnibusfilm Ten Minutes Older”. In Kollaboration. Beiträge zu Medientheorie und Kulturgeschichte der Zusammenarbeit, edited by Nacim Ghanbari, Isabell Otto, Samantha Schramm, and Tristan Thielmann, 57–80. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846758403_005.
Marres, Noortje, and Carolin Gerlitz. 2018. “Social Media as Experiments in Sociality”. In Inventing the Social, edited by Noortje Marres, Michael Guggenheim, and Alex Wilckie, 253-86. Manchester: Matterning Press. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/103450/.
Marres, Noortje, and Carolin Gerlitz. 2018. “Social Media as Experiments in Sociality”. In Inventing the Social, edited by Michael Guggenheim, Noortje Marres, and Alex Wilckie. Manchester: Mattering Press. https://www.matteringpress.org/books/inventing-the-social.
Opper, Teresa. 2018. “Spiel, Satz und Match‘. Zur kollaborativen Spezifik von Dating-Apps”. In Kollaboration. Beiträge zu Medientheorie und Kulturgeschichte der Zusammenarbeit, edited by Nacim Ghanbari, Isabell Otto, Samantha Schramm, and Tristan Thielmann, 97-120. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846758403_007.
Pánek, Jiří, Alex Gekker, Sam Hind, Jana Wendler, Chris Perkins, and Sybille Lammes. 2018. “Encountering Place: Mapping and Location-Based Games in Interdisciplinary Education”. The Cartographic Journal 55 (3): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2017.1386342.
Thielmann, Tristan. 2018. “Die bewegte Mediengeschichte des Fotofahrtenführers: ein Co-Motion-Picture”. In Kollaboration. Beiträge zu Medientheorie und Kulturgeschichte der Zusammenarbeit, edited by Nacim Ghanbari, Isabell Otto, Samantha Schramm, and Tristan Thielmann. Paderborn: Fink. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846758403_009.
Thielmann, Tristan. 2018. “Der einleuchtende Grund digitaler Bilder. Die Mediengeschichte und Medienpraxistheorie des Displays”. In Display / Dispositiv. Ästhetische Ordnungen, edited by Ursula Frohne, Lilian Haberer, and Annette Urban. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846756348_022.
Thielmann, Tristan, Carmen Schulz, and Michael Lommel. 2018. “Das Fahrrad: Ein Medium der Landerschließung”. In Landmedien und mediale Bilder von Ländlichkeit im 20. Jahrhundert, edited by Clemens Zimmermann, 15:205–230. Jahrbuch für Geschichte des ländlichen Raumes. Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.
2017
Gerlitz, Carolin. 2017. “Soziale Medien”. In Handbuch Popkultur, edited by Thomas Hecken and Marcus S. Kleiner, 235-39. Stuttgart: Metzler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05601-6_44.
Gerlitz, Carolin. 2017. “The multivalence of consumer affect”. In Charisma and the Arts of Market Attachment, edited by K. Hetherington, P. Harvey, and T. Bennett. London: Routledge.
Helmond, Anne, David B. Nieborg, and Fernando N. van der Vlist. 2017. “The Political Economy of Social Data: A Historical Analysis of Platform-Industry Partnerships”. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society, 38:1–38:5. #SMSociety17. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097324.
Passmann, Johannes, and Carolin Gerlitz. 2017. “Popularisierung einer digitalen Medien-Praktik”. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 47 (3): 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41244-017-0067-1.
van der Vlist, Fernando N. 2017. “Counter-Mapping Surveillance: A Critical Cartography of Mass Surveillance Technology After Snowden”. Surveillance & Society 15 (1): 137-57. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1401-0325.
Gerlitz Carolin. 2016. “What Counts? Reflections on the Multivalence of Social Media Data”. Digital Culture & Society 2 (2): 19-38. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0203.
Gerlitz, Carolin. 2016. “Data Point Critique”. In The Datafied Society Studying Culture through Data, edited by Mirco T. Schäfer and karin van Es, 241-45. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/12478.
Hind, Sam. 2016. “Territorial Determinism: Police Exercises, Training Spaces and Manoeuvres”. In Playful Mapping in the Digital Age, 94-113. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/29626.
van der Vlist, Fernando N. 2016. “Accounting for the social: Investigating commensuration and Big Data practices at Facebook”. Big Data & Society 3 (1): 1–16. 10.1177/2053951716631365.
2015
Marres, Noortje, and Carolin Gerlitz. 2015. “Interface Methods: Renegotiating Relations between Digital Social Research, STS and Sociology”. The Sociological Review 64 (1): 21-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12314.
