The lecture series will be held digitally until further notice. A Zoom-link for the lecture will be made available in advance via the SFB mailing list. Guests are welcome to register via Mail with Damaris Lehmann Send an email

Five years ago, not much ‘bottom up’ empirical research into people’s thoughts, feelings and experiences of datafication had been undertaken. But a lot has changed in a short time, and recent years have seen a proliferation of surveys, polls and qualitative research about such matters. Drawing on a comprehensive review of academic and grey literature on this topic, I will comment on some emergent themes and identify future directions for research in this area. These include: the affective dimensions of living data; whether more trust in datafication should be the goal; ideas about fairness; the importance of social inequalities and their absence in much of this research; and how the way that research is undertaken shapes what is found.

The lecture series will be held digitally until further notice. A Zoom-link for the lecture will be made available in advance via the SFB mailing list. Guests are welcome to register via Mail with Damaris Lehmann Send an email

Uwe Nettelbecks Fantômas. Eine Sittengeschichte des Erkennungsdienstes (1979) wurde im Jahrzehnt der Politik der Inneren Sicherheit in der Bundesrepublik publiziert. Fantômas. Eine Sittengeschichte des Erkennungsdienstes erschien in schwarzes Leinen gehüllt, mit schwarzem Farbschnitt und in einem schwarzem Schuber. Das Buch dreht sich um die Geschichte und Gegenwart der Kriminalistik. Im Mittelpunkt der knapp tausendseitigen literarischen Montage steht die Vision des BKA-Chefs Horst Herold, sein Entwurf einer EDV-gestützten Verbrechensbekämpfung, deren „Datensammelwut“ Bürgerrechtlern der 1970er Jahre Albträume bescherte. Uwe Nettelbecks Fantômas. Eine Sittengeschichte des Erkennungsdienstes fällt trotz dieser Aktualität bis heute durchs Raster der Literaturgeschichte

Presentation: Lara Saadi, Aikaterini Mniestri

Due to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the colloquium will be held online until further notice. For further information or registration please contact Tobias Conradi.

The lecture series will be held digitally until further notice. A Zoom-link for the lecture will be made available in advance via the SFB mailing list. Guests are welcome to register via Mail with Damaris Lehmann Send an email

As data are increasingly mobilized in the service of governments and corporations, their unequal conditions of production, their asymmetrical methods of application, and their unequal effects on both individuals and groups have become increasingly difficult for data scientists--and others who rely on data in their work--to ignore. But it is precisely this power that makes it worth asking: "Data science by whom? Data science for whom? Data science with whose interests in mind? These are some of the questions that emerge from what we call data feminism, a way of thinking about data science and its communication that is informed by the past several decades of intersectional feminist activism and critical thought. Illustrating data feminism in action, this talk will show how challenges to the male/female binary can help to challenge other hierarchical (and empirically wrong) classification systems; it will explain how an understanding of emotion can expand our ideas about effective data visualization; how the concept of invisible labor can expose the significant human efforts required by our automated systems; and why the data never, ever “speak for themselves.” The goal of this talk, as with the project of data feminism, is to model how scholarship can be transformed into action: how feminist thinking can be operationalized in order to imagine more ethical and equitable data practices.

Presentation: Max Kanderske, Misganaw Aynalem Tesfaye

Due to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the colloquium will be held online until further notice. For further information or registration please contact Tobias Conradi.

Language of the Workshop: German/tba

The lecture series will be held digitally until further notice. A Zoom-link for the lecture will be made available in advance via the SFB mailing list. Guests are welcome to register via Mail with Damaris Lehmann Send an email

Presentation: Niklas Strüver, Hoa Mai Trần

Due to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the colloquium will be held online until further notice. For further information or registration please contact Tobias Conradi.

The lecture series will be held digitally until further notice. A Zoom-link for the lecture will be made available in advance via the SFB mailing list. Guests are welcome to register via Mail with Damaris Lehmann Send an email

Die Verschmelzung von IT und Telekommunikation in digitalen Datennetzen brachte Technologien, Unternehmen, (inter-) nationale Organisationen und Regulierungsansätze miteinander in Berührung, die zuvor voneinander unabhängige Entwicklungen genommen hatten. Sie führte deshalb auch zu substanziellen Neujustierungen von Ordnungspolitiken, Unternehmenspolitiken oder (inter-) nationalen Regulierung- und Standardisierungsbemühungen, die nicht immer problemlos verliefen. Der Vortrag nimmt diese Probleme und Problemfelder in den Blick und fragt exemplarisch nach Entwicklungsbrüchen und deren Konsequenzen.

The lecture series will be held digitally until further notice. A Zoom-link for the lecture will be made available in advance via the SFB mailing list. Guests are welcome to register via Mail with Damaris Lehmann Send an email

Language: German/English

[more information to follow]

The phrase “off the grid” is commonly understood to refer to the voluntary decoupling from established infrastructure networks such as electricity, water or gas supply. The implication is one of material independence and a self-sufficient lifestyle. Going “off the grid” means making yourself invisible by rebuking the social and technological structures that normally organize our lives. It is entering, or returning to, uncharted territory. The grid from which you disappear is often imagined like a web that we are woven into, at once providing security – of cultural connectivity, opportunities to work, or societal participation – while also limiting individual, political or technological agency.

The grid also speaks to the geographic coordinate system, an all-encompassing global structure which makes it possible to accurately locate any point on earth. This unified grid represents a dominant ordering principle for everything “locatable”. It is part of the technological infrastructure of many platforms, services and applications which fall under the definition of geomedia, most prominently the Global Positioning System (GPS). In this regard, “off the grid” is a move away from such Cartesian notions of space towards a situated relational account of (quotidian) practices carried out with, through, or in relation to, geomedia.

Going off the grid has also been seen as a form of renunciation of the conveniences of the late capitalist (media) world in order to lead a supposedly slower, less stressful and eventually less superficial life – as inspired by the transcendentalism of the likes of Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson. But with so many people relying on the grid for purposes of work and entertainment in recent times, what does this mean for our relation to geomedia? What does going off the grid look like now? This presupposes, of course, that there is ipso facto a grid – an infrastructure – which one can connect to freely at any time. But a great number of people do not get to choose to decouple from the grid – a fact that speaks to questions of access to the socio-material infrastructures underpinning geomedia and associated communities and practices.

Arguably, practices of surveillance and countersurveillance concern the implicit or even involuntary participation in corresponding infrastructures. Here, optimization for a range of tasks and activities routinely involves a certain kind of surveillance; a default setting in the running of all kinds of media platforms used for navigation, video streaming or online gaming. In this, surveillance is wrapped up with profit-seeking practices, and the extraction of value from the ‘data fumes’ of platform users, who enter a form of “cooperation without consensus” as they stream movies, hire taxis, host videoconferences, ride public transport, or go on dates. In these various iterations, surveillance might look different, and/or be practiced in distinct ways to traditional forms of state or corporate surveillance, increasingly dependent on technological protocols and standards that not only underpin the grid but also govern our use of geomedia. One consequence is that the relation between private and public spheres is transformed, and introduces new questions of governance, exploitation and marginalization. It is of crucial importance, who is online, and who is offline might as well not exist. Yet these optimization processes are also subject to countermeasures that constitute new modes of existence - from anonymous accounts and the use of VPNs, to location spoofing, and other tricks and techniques to hide, erase, or obfuscate user activity and location.

Yet the grid is not all-encompassing, nor all-powerful. Whilst countersurveillance efforts resist, fight back and oppose, alternative geomedia projects imagine the grid differently – sometimes even plotting its demise. From community broadband initiatives, to independent media organizations, post-capitalist streaming platforms, and citizen science projects; there is a continued, concerted effort to build alternatives to state-based, or company-owned geomedia, operating at various scales from the hyperlocal to the global. Through these efforts, organizers and participants question the foundations of our collective social and technological infrastructures, redefining what it is to care, share, distribute, cultivate or reallocate funds, resources, opportunities and ideas – bringing new geomedia, and new imaginaries of hope (or perhaps fear), into existence.

Keynote Speakers:

• Caren Kaplan – University of California at Davis, USA
• Nanna Verhoeff – Utrecht University, Netherlands

Suggested paper topics include, but are not limited to:

• Politics, philosophy and ethics of going off grid
• Grid as Network, Grid as Default (Geomedia and Infrastructure)
• Physical Geography/Relational Geography
• Inhabiting Digital Geographies (VR, hybrid spaces)
• Geomedia in the Global South
• Urban and Rural Geomedia
• The ‘geo’ in Geomedia, the ‘media’ in Geomedia
• Governing Geomedia (smart city, sensor media, infrastructures, surveillance & countersurveillance)
• Geomedia Activism
• Digital detox, rationing, quarantine and isolation
• Geomedia Histories

Geomedia 2021 welcomes proposals for individual papers as well as thematic panels in English.

Individual paper proposals: The author submits an abstract of 200–250 words. Accepted papers are grouped by the organizers into sessions of 5 papers according to thematic area.

Thematic panel proposals: The chair of the panel submits a proposal consisting of 4–5 individual paper abstracts (200-250 words) along with a general panel presentation of 200–250 words.

Conference timeline:

• October 31st 2020: Submission system opens
• January 7th 2021: Deadline for thematic panel and individual paper proposals
• January 25th 2021: Notes of acceptance and registration opens
• March 15th 2021: Last day of registration

Conference website:

Information about registration, conference programme, venue, social events and practical arrangements will be posted continuously on the conference website starting September 1st:
www.geomediastudies.com.

Contact: You can reach us at info@geomediastudies.com.

Organizers and venue:

Geomedia 2021 is hosted by the Graduate School “Locating Media” and the CRC “Media of Cooperation” at the Department of Media Research, Siegen University, Siegen. The venue is situated east of Cologne in downtown Siegen, a lovely, off-the-beaten path industrial hub with a thriving university of over 20,000 students. The Locating Media Graduate School (2012-2021) is a German Research Foundation-funded interdisciplinary programme that researches historical and current media practices ‘in motion’ and ‘in situ’ and engages scholars with interests in locational and situational analyses and the development of new methods for the analysis and design of mobile digital media.